Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Teeple's avatar

Male librarians also model for boys the importance of books, reading, and self-education. I hope librarians will also be included in this new network somehow.

Michael Ronin's avatar

Richard, I share your concern about male representation in the classroom, and M.E.N. is a serious institutional response to a serious structural problem. But the conversation needs to go further than it currently does, on several fronts.

First, the legal environment. In the post-#MeToo landscape, as I document in Modern Masculinity for the Conscious Man, men are acutely aware that they are "just one accusation away from reputational and career ruination." The accusation need be for only the mildest impropriety to receive condemnation and retribution . And in a professional context involving children, the exposure is amplified exponentially. Until there are substantive legal reforms that restore due process protections for accused men, restore the presumption of innocence, and introduce meaningful penalties for false allegations, many men will do the rational thing and stay away. No amount of cultural encouragement overcomes a demonstrable legal asymmetry. Recruitment campaigns without legal reform are whistling in the wind.

Second, the pay and conditions issue. Teachers bring knowledge, dedication, and extraordinary emotional labor to a role that shapes the next generation. The compensation (financial and in terms of workload) is not remotely commensurate with that contribution. This isn't incidental; it reflects how the system actually values the work.

Which brings me to the deeper structural problem. As I write in my book, the institutional role of schools, within the current paradigm, is "to train people for obedience and conformity, and to make them controllable and indoctrinated." Getting more men into classrooms is a worthy goal but more men staffing an indoctrination mill doesn't constitute progress toward human flourishing. The system is designed to produce functional workers, not fully realized human beings. Maria Montessori understood this more than a century ago. Her "prepared environment" (as I explore in my essay, Humanity's Bull Market) is built on the radical premise that children's intrinsic drive toward genuine mastery is the engine of development, and the educator's role is to honor and activate it rather than suppress it in service of industrial credentialing.

The question worth asking isn't only: how do we get more men into education? It's: what kind of education are we putting them into?

22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?